12 Comments
User's avatar
The Cryptkeeper's avatar

The crypt respects the discipline. Cash flow and repetition matter. But dividends aren’t a machine, they’re a contract with the cycle. They hold, thin, or break under stress. Good structure, just don’t mistake process for inevitability. 🕯️

Alpha Engines by Gianni's avatar

Have you checked out the REIT Millrose Properties? Lennar spin-off. 10% dividend right now

TheGamingDividend's avatar

Thanks for putting it on my radar. I'll take a look at it today!

Alpha Engines by Gianni's avatar

I have written a deep-dive on it. 30min read, 3k views. I think it’s worth your time. Let me know, if you have any questions.

https://gianniccc.substack.com/p/millrose-properties-mrp-remains-my?r=6mm4iv&utm_medium=ios

Steven Carini's avatar

Do you have a recommended percentage of each of these three?

TheGamingDividend's avatar

no recommendations here! Really depends on your preference, objectives, and age bracket.

Steve Kang's avatar

I love it!

TheGamingDividend's avatar

Appreciate you!

Grady Reese's avatar

How does your model account for NAV erosion? Every time I chase dividends with ETFs using options strategies, I get burned by the NAV erosion.

TheGamingDividend's avatar

SPYI is quite different. It actually holds the equities it writes options against and since the yield isn't overly generous, NAV erosion is very minimal.

Any option ETF with a yield above 12% is going to be prone to nav erosion

Barry Goldmember's avatar

So you're advising creating unnecessary taxable events for investors in the accumulation phase?

TheGamingDividend's avatar

"unnecessary" is a bit disingenuous. Paying taxes for more income is a fine tradeoff. And the tax impact is minimal anyways for these